<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">glonucsec</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Глобальная ядерная безопасность</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Global Nuclear Safety</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2305-414X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2499-9733</issn><publisher><publisher-name>National Research Nuclear University "MEPhI"</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26583/gns-2026-02-11</article-id><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">VJXYCQ</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">glonucsec-509</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КУЛЬТУРА БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ И СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ АСПЕКТЫ РАЗВИТИЯ ТЕРРИТОРИЙ РАЗМЕЩЕНИЯ ОБЪЕКТОВ АТОМНОЙ ОТРАСЛИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SAFETY CULTURE AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS DEVELOPMENT OF PLACEMENT TERRITORIES NUCLEAR INDUSTRY FACILITIES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Устойчивое достижение нулевого LTIFR и экономическая эффективность мер промышленной безопасности в металлургическом производстве на примере АО «Ульбинский металлургический завод»</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Sustained zero LTIFR and the economic effectiveness of industrial safety measures in metallurgical production at Ulba metallurgical plant JSC</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Идрисов</surname><given-names>Т. Ш.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Idrisov</surname><given-names>T. Sh.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>главный технический руководитель по охране труда и охране окружающей среды Бериллиевого производства;</p><p>магистр</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Chief Technical Officer of Labor and Environmental Protection, Berillyevo Production; Master's Degree</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коптелов</surname><given-names>М. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Koptelov</surname><given-names>M. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат экономических наук, начальник информационно-аналитического центра ОСЧС;</p><p>доцент кафедры № 71</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Can. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Information and Analytical Centre, Situational and Crisis Centre; Associate Professor of Department №71</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>АО «Ульбинский металлургический завод» АО «НАК «Казатомпром»;&#13;
Национальный исследовательский ядерный университет «МИФИ»</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC, Kazatomprom JSC;&#13;
National Research Nuclear University «MEPhI»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Национальный исследовательский ядерный университет «МИФИ»;&#13;
Частное учреждение по информационно-аналитическому обеспечению &#13;
«Ситуационно-кризисный Центр Росатома»</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>National Research Nuclear University «MEPhI»;&#13;
Situational and Crisis Centre of State Corporation Rosatom</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>06</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>116</fpage><lpage>126</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Идрисов Т.Ш., Коптелов М.В., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Идрисов Т.Ш., Коптелов М.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Idrisov T.S., Koptelov M.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://glonucsec.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/509">https://glonucsec.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/509</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье представлен количественный анализ динамики производственного травматизма и экономической эффективности мероприятий промышленной безопасности в бериллиевом производстве АО «Ульбинский металлургический завод» (АО «УМЗ») за 2020-2024 годы. Исследование основано на данных внутренней отчетности предприятия, включающих показатель LTIFR, число несчастных случаев с потерей трудоспособности, годовые затраты на охрану труда и промышленную безопасность, а также ведущие показатели состояния барьерной системы. Установлено, что в 2020 г. LTIFR составил 0,18, в 2021 г. – 0,28 (максимальное значение за период), после чего в 2022-2024 гг. показатель стабильно равен 0,00. Параллельно объем затрат на охрану труда увеличился с 1 382 325 тыс. тг (2020 г.) и 1 608 726 тыс. тг (2021 г.) до 2 102 982 тыс. тг (2022 г.) и 2 814 728 тыс. тг (2023 г.), с последующей оптимизацией до 1 997 480 тыс. тг в 2024 году. Анализ показывает, что за четырехлетний интервал достигнуто снижение LTIFR с 0,28 до 0,00 и его удержание в течение трех последовательных лет. Экономическая оценка мероприятий по снижению риска выполнена на основе показателя ожидаемых годовых потерь (EAL). Приведенные затраты (PV(C)) составили около 25 млн тг, тогда как приведенный эффект предотвращенных потерь (PV(ΔEAL)) достиг 59 млн тг при горизонте расчета 10 лет и ставке дисконтирования 12 %. Коэффициент выгоды-затраты (BCR) превышает 2,0, что свидетельствует о положительной чистой приведенной стоимости реализованных мер. Анализ ведущих показателей показал рост охвата проверок критических контролей с 60 % до 90 %, увеличение охвата обучением с 85 % до 97 %, снижение доли несоответствий с 18 % до 9 %, сокращение среднего срока устранения нарушений более чем в два раза и рост числа сообщений о near-miss с 40 до 80 случаев в год. Полученные результаты подтверждают системный характер достигнутого эффекта и соответствие траектории «рост инвестиций – нулевой LTIFR – оптимизация затрат» принципу ALARP. Показано, что устойчивое удержание LTIFR на уровне 0,00 в течение 2022-2024 гг. связано с комплексом инженерных, организационных и поведенческих мер и сопровождается положительной экономической отдачей.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper presents a quantitative analysis of occupational injury dynamics and the economic effectiveness of industrial safety measures in the Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC (UMP JSC) for the period 2020-2024. The study is based on internal corporate reporting data, including the Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR), the number of lost-time injuries, annual expenditures on occupational and industrial safety, and leading indicators reflecting the condition of the safety barrier system. The results show that LTIFR amounted to 0.18 in 2020 and increased to 0.28 in 2021 (the maximum value within the analyzed period), after which it declined to 0.00 and remained at this level throughout 2022-2024. In parallel, total safety expenditures increased from 1,382,325 thousand KZT in 2020 and 1,608,726 thousand KZT in 2021 to 2,102,982 thousand KZT in 2022 and 2,814,728 thousand KZT in 2023, followed by optimization to 1,997,480 thousand KZT in 2024. The data demonstrate a reduction in LTIFR from 0.28 to 0.00 over a four-year interval and its sustained maintenance for three consecutive years. The economic evaluation of risk reduction measures was performed using the Expected Annual Loss (EAL) approach. The present value of costs (PV(C)) is approximately 25 million KZT, while the present value of prevented losses (PV(ΔEAL)) reaches 59 million KZT over a 10-year horizon at a 12% discount rate. The benefit-cost ratio (BCR) exceeded 2.0, indicating a positive net present value of the implemented safety measures. Leading indicators showed significant improvements: coverage of critical control inspections increased from 60% to 90%, training coverage rose from 85% to 97%, the proportion of non-conformities decreased from 18% to 9%, the average time required for corrective actions was reduced by more than half, and near-miss reporting increased from 40 to 80 cases per year. The findings confirm the systemic nature of the achieved effect and demonstrate that the trajectory «increased safety investment – zero LTIFR – expenditure optimization» is consistent with the ALARP principle. Sustained zero LTIFR in 2022-2024 is associated with a combination of engineering, organizational, and behavioral measures and is accompanied by a positive economic return on safety investments.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>промышленная безопасность</kwd><kwd>LTIFR</kwd><kwd>охрана труда</kwd><kwd>ALARP</kwd><kwd>экономическая эффективность</kwd><kwd>EAL</kwd><kwd>барьерная модель риска</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>industrial safety</kwd><kwd>LTIFR</kwd><kwd>occupational health and safety</kwd><kwd>ALARP</kwd><kwd>economic efficiency</kwd><kwd>Expected Annual Loss</kwd><kwd>safety barrier model</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ильенко Е.П. Экономическая оценка системы управления охраной труда и промышленной безопасностью на горнодобывающих предприятиях. Дисс. на соиск. уч. ст. к. э. н. С-Пб-2017., 2017. 160 с. https://spmi.ru/sites/default/files/imci_images/sciens/dissertacii/2017/2017-3/ilenko_dissertaciya_nasayt_dok_.pdf (дата обращения: 18.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ильенко Е.П. Экономическая оценка системы управления охраной труда и промышленной безопасностью на горнодобывающих предприятиях. Дисс. на соиск. уч. ст. к. э. н. С-Пб-2017., 2017. 160 с. https://spmi.ru/sites/default/files/imci_images/sciens/dissertacii/2017/2017-3/ilenko_dissertaciya_nasayt_dok_.pdf (дата обращения: 18.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ab Rahim M.S., Reniers G., Yang M., Siwayanan P. Integrating Process Safety and Process Security Risk Man-agement: Practitioner Insights for a Resilience-Oriented Framework. Processes. 2025;13(2):392. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020392 (accessed: 19.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ab Rahim M.S., Reniers G., Yang M., Siwayanan P. Integrating Process Safety and Process Security Risk Man-agement: Practitioner Insights for a Resilience-Oriented Framework. Processes. 2025;13(2):392. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020392 (accessed: 19.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stefana E., Ustolin F., Paltrinieri N. IMPROSafety: A risk-based framework to integrate occupational and process safety. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2022;75:104698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104698 (accessed: 19.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stefana E., Ustolin F., Paltrinieri N. IMPROSafety: A risk-based framework to integrate occupational and process safety. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2022;75:104698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104698 (accessed: 19.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hale A.R., Guldenmund F.W., van Loenhout P.L., Oh J.I.H. Evaluating safety management and culture inter-ventions to improve safety: Effective intervention strategies. Safety science. 2010;48(8):1026-1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.05.006 (accessed: 19.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hale A.R., Guldenmund F.W., van Loenhout P.L., Oh J.I.H. Evaluating safety management and culture inter-ventions to improve safety: Effective intervention strategies. Safety science. 2010;48(8):1026-1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.05.006 (accessed: 19.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Markert F., Duijm N.J., Thommesen J. Modelling of safety barriers including human and organisational factors to improve process safety. Chemical engineering transactions. 2013;31:283-288. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1331048 (accessed: 20.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Markert F., Duijm N.J., Thommesen J. Modelling of safety barriers including human and organisational factors to improve process safety. Chemical engineering transactions. 2013;31:283-288. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1331048 (accessed: 20.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Theophilus S.C., Nwankwo C.D., Acquah‐Andoh E., Bassey E., Umoren U. Integrating human factors (HF) into a process safety management system (PSMS). Process safety progress. 2017;37(1):67-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11909 (accessed: 20.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Theophilus S.C., Nwankwo C.D., Acquah‐Andoh E., Bassey E., Umoren U. Integrating human factors (HF) into a process safety management system (PSMS). Process safety progress. 2017;37(1):67-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.11909 (accessed: 20.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abrahamsen T.A.E. On the use of cost-benefit analysis in ALARP processes. International Journal of Performa-bility Engineering, 2007;3(3):345-353. Available at: https://www.ijpe-online.com/EN/10.23940/ijpe.07.3.p345.mag (accessed: 25.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abrahamsen T.A.E. On the use of cost-benefit analysis in ALARP processes. International Journal of Performa-bility Engineering, 2007;3(3):345-353. Available at: https://www.ijpe-online.com/EN/10.23940/ijpe.07.3.p345.mag (accessed: 25.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reiman T., Pietikäinen E. Leading indicators of system safety – Monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential. Safety science. 2012;50(10):1993-2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.015 (accessed: 25.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reiman T., Pietikäinen E. Leading indicators of system safety – Monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential. Safety science. 2012;50(10):1993-2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.015 (accessed: 25.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Phimister J.R., Oktem U., Kleindorfer P.R., Kunreuther H. Near‐miss incident management in the chemical pro-cess industry. Risk Analysis: An International Journal. 2003;23(3):445-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00326 (accessed: 25.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Phimister J.R., Oktem U., Kleindorfer P.R., Kunreuther H. Near‐miss incident management in the chemical pro-cess industry. Risk Analysis: An International Journal. 2003;23(3):445-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00326 (accessed: 25.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sundström E., Nygren M. Safety Initiatives in Support of Safety Culture Development: Examples from Four Mining Organisations. Mining, Metallurgy &amp; Exploration. 2023;40:1007-1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-023-00809-y (accessed: 25.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sundström E., Nygren M. Safety Initiatives in Support of Safety Culture Development: Examples from Four Mining Organisations. Mining, Metallurgy &amp; Exploration. 2023;40:1007-1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-023-00809-y (accessed: 25.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ali M. X.M., Arifin K., Abas A., Ahmad M.A., Khairil M., Cyio M.B., Samad M.A., Lampe I., Mahfudz M., Ali M.N. Systematic Literature Review on Indicators Use in Safety Management Practices among Utility Industries. Inter-national Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(10):6198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106198 (accessed: 26.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ali M. X.M., Arifin K., Abas A., Ahmad M.A., Khairil M., Cyio M.B., Samad M.A., Lampe I., Mahfudz M., Ali M.N. Systematic Literature Review on Indicators Use in Safety Management Practices among Utility Industries. Inter-national Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(10):6198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106198 (accessed: 26.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaplan S., Garrick B.J. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk analysis. 1981;1(1):11-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x (accessed: 26.02.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaplan S., Garrick B.J. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk analysis. 1981;1(1):11-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x (accessed: 26.02.2026).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
